Tapussa and Bhallika, the Buddha’s First Disciples

In the Mahavacchagotta Sutta of the Majjhima Nikaya the Buddha mentioned that he had many thousands of disciples, a good number of whom had attained one or another of the stages leading to enlightenment. However, the Buddha’s first disciples were the merchants Tapussa and Bhallika. During the Buddha’s fourth week at Uruvela, now called Bodh Gaya, these two men happened to be passing the outskirts of the village and saw him quietly meditating there. Impressed his serene looks and the aura of peace around him they approached him with an offering of barley gruel and honey balls.  When the Buddha had finished eating the  merchants asked if they could take refuge in him, i.e. become his disciples, and his Dhamma. They did not take the third refuge because the Sangha had not yet been established.  The Tipitaka contains almost no other information about these two individuals. In the Anguttara Nikaya the Buddha describes them as  “the first person to take Refuge”  and in the Theragatha   there is a verse by a Bhallika, although it is not certain if this is the same Bhallika as the one who met the Buddha at Uruvela.

Perhaps because these two men were the first  upasakas, or because  of the dearth of information about them, many legends grew around these    men. But if we know almost nothing about them perhaps we might be able to find out where they came from, because several countries have claimed them as their own. When the Chinese pilgrim Xuanzang was in northern Afghanistan in the 5th century on his way to India he visited two towns, each named after the merchants and each claiming to be their hometowns. Just outside each town was stupa supposedly enshrining strands of hair from the  Awakened One’s head  given to Tapussa and Bhallika by the Buddha. One of these towns was Balkh, now in northern Afghanistan, and one quite credible theory is that the town’s name is derived from the name Bhallika. There are ruins from the Buddhist period scattered around Balkh and several of these are certainly stupas, although now most of them look like nothing more than mounds of broken bricks. Some 35 kilometres from Balkh and north of the new AH76 highway is a village named Tabus, and although small and obscure the many mounds in the area indicate that it was once a substantial place. It is quite possible that the village’s name is derived from the name Tapussa.

Unfortunately, because of political turmoil and lack of interest in the pre-Islamic history of Afghanistan in that country, it is unlikely that any of these ruins will ever be excavated. Balkh’s museum, formerly the country’s second largest, was sacked during the Taliban period and most of its Buddhist relics were looted or destroyed.

The ancient Sri Lankans claimed Tapussa and Bhallika as their own. At Tiriyaya on the north-east coast of Sri Lanka, is a beautiful ancient stupa supposedly built by the two merchants to enshrine hair given to them by the Buddha. On an area of flat rock a little below the top of  Tiriyaya’s  hill is a Sanskrit  inscription  in the Pallava Grantha script of South India dating from either the 7th or 8th  century.  The writer mentions that the stupa was built by Tapussa and Bhallika and then praises its charms and holiness.  He also mentions that the name of the place is Girikanda. Interestingly, the Pujavaliya recounts the legend of the Buddha giving some strands of his hair to the merchants and says that they are now enshrined at Girikanda, showing that this must have been Tiriyaya’s ancient name. The inscription is also interesting because it  suggests that some South Indian Tamils were still Buddhist in the 7th or 8th centuries and that some of them were coming to Sri Lanka on pilgrimage.

Not to be left behind, the Burmese insist that Tapussa and Bhallika were from their country. The great golden Shwedagon Pagoda in Yangon contains, Burmese legend says, eight hairs that the Buddha gave the two merchants.

So what is the truth? Where did the Buddha’s first disciples come from?  Let us examine the evidence. Firstly, it is highly unlikely that they came from beyond India, mainly because continental and international trade to and from northern India had hardly began during the in the 5th century BCE. Can  we really suppose that two men should bring their  merchandise  all the way from Balkh in the far north of Afghanistan, or take a ship from Sri Lanka or Burma and then a wagon to Bodh Gaya with only the goods they could carry? Highly improbable!  What about the Shwedagon Pagoda? The problem here is that this beautiful monument is not mentioned in any documents or inscriptions before the 10th century CE, i.e. some 1500 years after the Buddha, plenty of time for legends to develop.

The Vinaya says that the two merchants came from Ukkala which most historians and Indologists identify as being somewhere in Orissa on the east coast of India.  Interestingly, recent archaeological findings would appear to confirm this. A series of small rock-cut caves were recently found in Tarapur, Jaipur District,  and in one of them was an inscription in Brahmi script dating from about the 2nd century BCE.  As deciphered by J. Jayprakash, epigraphist for Archaeological Survey of India, the inscription specifically mentioned the names Tapussa and Bhallika, saying that they had made a gift of some kind. Further up the hill where the caves are located  are the remains of a stupa and archaeologists surmise that the gift the two men made was the stupa. Unfortunately this  stupa is too ruined to yield relic that might have originally been in it or any inscription that could clinch the matter. Whatever the case, these discoveries, older than any of the other claims about the two men or any legend make it almost certain than the Buddha’s first disciples, were Indians, not Afghanis, Sinhalese or Burmese.